The British Repressive Measures Against the Bengal Native Infantry And The Rebels

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66853/hnh.v1i1.09

Keywords:

Bengal Native Infantry, British Repressive, 1857 Revolt

Abstract

Indian history commemorates a fiery era in various ways. Extensive literature and research have centered around India's First War of Independence—the Great Revolt of 1857. Over time, people have explored the multifaceted aspects of this Great Revolt. From a contemporary perspective, scholars have examined the historical relevance of the past, analyzing the contributions of various social classes to the uprising, their reactions to it, and the very nature of the rebellion itself. In modern times, new avenues of research have emerged focusing on the contributions of women to the 1857 Revolt, as well as the unity, leadership, and valor displayed by the sepoys. Throughout its history, a fertile, prosperous, and affluent India has witnessed the arrival of numerous foreign powers—such as the Sikhs, Hindus, Pathan and Mughals—who engaged in trade, governance, and exploitation within the country. In the 16th century, various European mercantile groups—including the Portuguese, French, Dutch, and British—reached coastal nations across the globe via maritime routes in pursuit of trade opportunities. It was in this manner that Vasco da Gama arrived in India in 1498,20 may AD, seeking commercial prospects. The Portuguese were the first to establish treaties with India's Mughal emperors, subsequently setting up trading outposts in coastal regions such as Goa, Daman and Diu, and Surat. They procured commodities—such as spices, silk, rice, cotton, and opium—from India at low prices and subsequently sold them in European markets at exorbitant rates. On August 24, 1608 AD, the English first arrived at the ports of Gujarat and Surat to engage in trade. Captain William Hawkins sought permission from the Mughal Emperor Jahangir to conduct commercial activities; however, Jahangir issued a direct refusal.

References

Swapnil Bhagat, From Partners to Prey: Indian Bankers, the East India Company, and Fiscal Restructuring in Bengal, 1757–1772 (working paper, SSRN, December 1, 2025), accessed June 1, 2026

Kundan Kumar Thakur, “British Colonial Exploitation of India and Globalization,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 74 (2013).

Nick Robins, “The Corporation That Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational,” Asian Affairs 43, no. 1 (2012).

Bayley, Steuart Colvin. “Clive, Lord, and His Part in the Foundation of the Indian Empire: Chairman’s Address.” Journal of the Society of Arts 56, no. 7 (1907).

Heather Streets, Martial Races: The Military, Race and Masculinity in British Imperial Culture, 1857–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004).

Kaushik Roy, “The Historiography of the Colonial Indian Army,” Studies in History 12, no. 2 (1996).

Pratik Chakrabarti, Materials and Medicine: Trade, Conquest and Therapeutics in the Eighteenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010).

Anand A. Yang, “Indian Convict Workers in Southeast Asia in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries,” Journal of World History 14, no. 2 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2003.0029.

Jean Sutton, The East India Company’s Maritime Service, 1746–1834: Masters of the Eastern Seas (Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2010).

Manas Dutta, “Political Turbulences and the Rebelliousness of the Madras Presidency Army: An Introspection of the Great Uprising of 1857 in Colonial South India,” Indian Historical Review 43, no. 1 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1177/0376983616628368

Bertil Lintner, Burma in Revolt: Opium and Insurgency Since 1948 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).

Daniel M. Thompson, Violent Trajectories: A Cultural History of the Enfield Rifle in the British Empire (master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 2017).

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The British Repressive Measures Against the Bengal Native Infantry And The Rebels. (2026). History and Heritage, 1(1), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.66853/hnh.v1i1.09